Paper I · 2018 · Q 5(b) · 10 Marks
Discuss evidence on slavery provided by Ibn Batuta with special reference to female slaves.
16. The Fourteenth Century › Slavery
Answer:
Ibn Battuta, the Moroccan traveller who spent several years at Muhammad bin Tughlaq's court, left the fullest contemporary account of slavery in fourteenth-century India, and his testimony is particularly informative about the position and uses of female slaves.
Slavery in his account
- Slaves were abundant, cheap and freely bought and sold in the markets.
- War captives were a principal source, and slaves were also received as tribute and gifts.
- The Sultan maintained vast numbers, and Firoz Shah is said to have held some 180,000.
- Ibn Battuta himself received and presented slaves as a matter of course.
Female slaves in particular
- He records their sale at very low prices, noting how cheaply he purchased them.
- They served in domestic work, as attendants and in the harem.
- Many were trained as singers, dancers and musicians for entertainment at court.
- Some were employed as spies to report on the nobles to the Sultan.
- Female slaves were presented as gifts among nobles and to visiting dignitaries.
Value and limitations
- His is an eyewitness account by a well-placed observer with access to the court.
- He wrote from memory years later, so numbers may be exaggerated.
- His perspective is that of the elite, telling us little of slaves' own experience.
Ibn Battuta's Rihla thus remains our richest source on Sultanate slavery, especially for the female slaves whose domestic, artistic and even political roles he describes. As historians caution, his figures must be treated with reserve, yet his testimony establishes beyond doubt how deeply slavery was woven into elite life in fourteenth-century India.
More from this chapter
- “Alauddin Khilji’s economic measures aimed at centralising political authority in the Delhi Sultanate.” Elucidate.Paper I · 2025 · 10M
- Evaluate Firuz Shah Tughluq’s economic policies.Paper I · 2024 · 10M
- What factors do you attribute for the decline of the Delhi Sultanate?Paper I · 2023 · 10M
- The motive of Alauddin Khalji’s agrarian policy was to curb the powers of the intermediaries. Examine the measures which he adopted to achieve his objective.Paper I · 2023 · 10M
- The market regulations of Ala-ud-din Khilji were useful for the Sultan’s military might but harmful for the economy of the Sultanate. Comment.Paper I · 2022 · 15M
- Why is the reign of the Khaljis known as the 'Khalji Revolution'?Paper I · 2021 · 15M
- Critically evaluate the Muslim Nobility during the period of Tughlaq dynasty.Paper I · 2020 · 10M
- How did international trade support urbanisation in North India during the 13-14th century CE.Paper I · 2020 · 10M
- Elaborate upon the agrarian reforms of Alauddin Khilji.Paper I · 2020 · 20M
- Some new crafts production were introduced by the Turks. Comment.Paper I · 2020 · 15M
- The economic measures of Alauddin Khalji were aimed at greater political control. Discuss.Paper I · 2019 · 10M
- Delineate the state of agriculture during the Sultanate period.Paper I · 2019 · 15M
- Discuss the advancement made in Textile Technology under the Delhi Sultans.Paper I · 2018 · 10M
- "The policy of creating heterogeneous nobility by Muhammad Tughluq started the process of disintegration of Delhi Sultanate". Explain.Paper I · 2018 · 20M
- Describe the new architectural features added by successive Sultans' in the construction of Tombs in India.Paper I · 2018 · 20M
- To what extent was the Caliphate the source and sanction to the legal authority of the Sultans of Delhi?Paper I · 2017 · 15M
- Delineate non-agricultural production and urban economy in the 13th and 14th centuries C.E.Paper I · 2017 · 20M
- Do you agree that the schemes of Muhammad bin Tughluq were correctly conceived, badly executed and disastrously abandoned? Discuss.Paper I · 2017 · 15M
- Do you think that the economic measures introduced by the Sultanate rulers were beneficial to the common people as well? Illustrate with examples.Paper I · 2016 · 20M