Paper II · 2019 · Q 6(a) · 20 Marks
How did the policies of governments facilitate the process of industrialization in Europe?
The Industrial Revolution › Industrialisation
Answer:
European industrialisation was not the work of private enterprise alone. Governments, especially in the later-industrialising states of the continent, actively created the legal, financial, educational and infrastructural conditions without which rapid industrial growth would have been impossible.
Legal and institutional foundations
- States guaranteed private property, enforced contracts and codified commercial law.
- The Napoleonic Code provided a uniform legal framework across much of the continent.
- Company and limited-liability laws enabled the mobilisation of large capital.
- Patent laws protected and rewarded technical innovation.
Removing internal barriers
- The Prussian-led Zollverein of 1834 created a German customs union and a national market.
- France and other states abolished internal tolls, guild restrictions and seigneurial dues.
- Standardised weights, measures and currency eased exchange.
Infrastructure and finance
- Governments built or subsidised railways, canals, roads and ports.
- Belgium constructed a state railway network from the 1830s as deliberate policy.
- Central banks and state-supported investment banks such as the Credit Mobilier channelled capital.
- In Russia, Witte used state investment, foreign loans and the Trans-Siberian Railway to force industrial growth.
Tariffs, education and labour
- Protective tariffs sheltered infant industries, as Friedrich List had urged in Germany.
- Technical and scientific education was promoted through polytechnics and universities.
- Prussia's system of technical schools supplied trained engineers and chemists.
- State orders for armaments and railways guaranteed markets for heavy industry.
A qualified assessment
- Britain industrialised first with comparatively little direct state direction.
- Later industrialisers relied more heavily on the state, as Alexander Gerschenkron argued.
- Government action supplied the framework; entrepreneurship and technology did the rest.
Comparative patterns
- Belgium industrialised early with heavy state investment in railways and coal.
- France proceeded more slowly, the state supporting banking and infrastructure.
- Germany's rapid rise rested on the Zollverein, technical education and investment banks.
- Russia's state-led spurt under Witte concentrated on railways and heavy industry.
- The state's role grew progressively greater the later a country began to industrialise.
Government policy therefore facilitated European industrialisation decisively, above all in the later-developing economies. As Gerschenkron's analysis of relative backwardness shows, the further behind a country stood, the greater the role of the state and of banks in mobilising the capital and skills that private enterprise alone could not supply.
More from this chapter
- "Industrial Revolution had far reaching social and political consequences with the advent of assembly line factories, urbanization and rise of the urban working class." Critically examine.Paper II · 2020 · 10M
- "The Industrial Revolution put mobility in the place of stability". Critically examine.Paper II · 2018 · 10M
- Explain why England became the harbinger of Industrial Revolution. Also throw light on its social consequences.Paper II · 2017 · 20M