Paper II · 2021 · Q 3(c) · 10 Marks
While individually the Marathas were clever and brave, they lacked the corporate spirit so essential for national independence. Discuss with reasons.
2. British Expansion in India › Decline of the Marathas
Answer:
The Marathas rose as a formidable power in the eighteenth century, yet their failure to present a united front against the British is often attributed to a lack of collective or "corporate" spirit.
Individual Ability
- Leaders like the Peshwas, Mahadji Scindia, Nana Phadnavis and Ahilyabai Holkar showed courage, diplomacy and administrative skill.
Absence of Corporate Spirit
Confederacy of rival chiefs:
- The Maratha polity became a loose confederacy of Scindia, Holkar, Bhonsle and Gaekwad, often pursuing selfish interests.
- Mutual jealousy and internal wars (e.g., after the Third Battle of Panipat, 1761) weakened them.
British exploitation of disunity:
- The English used subsidiary alliances and divide-and-rule to defeat the chiefs one by one in the Anglo-Maratha Wars.
Other Reasons
- Weak central authority, financial disorder and lack of a broad national ideology beyond regional loyalties.
Therefore, though individual Marathas were brave and capable, the absence of unity and corporate purpose left them vulnerable, allowing the British to subdue them piecemeal.
More from this chapter
- “The Sikh monarchy was Napoleonic in the suddenness of its rise, the brilliancy of its success and the completeness of its overthrow.”Paper II · 2025 · 10M
- “The seeds of domestic dissensions were thickly and deeply sown in the Maratha system under the Peshwas.”Paper II · 2025 · 10M
- Twenty years of peace secured by the Treaty of Salbai proved very costly to the Marathas in strategic terms. Elucidate.Paper II · 2024 · 10M
- “The Battle of Plassey (1757) was a skirmish while the Battle of Buxar (1764) was a real war.”Paper II · 2022 · 10M
- “The Treaty of Amritsar (1809) was significant for its immediate as well as potential effects.”Paper II · 2022 · 10M
- Tipu Sultan had little success in setting forth a course of change significantly different from the general experience of the 18th century crisis of Indian politics and society. Critically examine.Paper II · 2021 · 10M