Paper II · 2021 · Q 2(c) · 10 Marks
The East India Company had thought that they had found an ideal puppet in Mir Qasim. Mir Qasim, however, belied the expectations of the Company. Examine critically.
1. European Penetration into India › Bengal after Plassey — Mir Qasim
Answer:
Placed on the Bengal throne by the Company in 1760, Mir Qasim was expected to be a pliant puppet; instead he proved an able and independent ruler who resisted Company domination.
Company Expectations
- Mir Qasim gained the throne by displacing Mir Jafar and granting the districts of Burdwan, Midnapore and Chittagong to the Company.
- The Company hoped for a compliant Nawab who would serve its commercial interests.
How He Belied Them
Assertion of independence:
- Shifted his capital to Munger, reorganised the army and finances to reduce dependence on the Company.
- Objected to the misuse of the dastak (duty-free trade permits) by Company servants, which ruined Indian merchants and state revenue.
- Abolished internal duties for all, removing the Company's unfair advantage — provoking conflict.
Outcome
- War followed; defeated, he allied with Awadh and the Mughal emperor, leading to the Battle of Buxar (1764).
Therefore, Mir Qasim was no puppet — his efforts to defend Bengal's sovereignty and revenue against Company abuses belied their expectations, though he ultimately failed militarily.
More from this chapter
- “During the Carnatic Wars, the French position, which at one time dazzled the Indian world by its political successes, was destined to end in humiliation and failure.” Explain.Paper II · 2025 · 20M
- After the battle of Plassey, the mercenary became the Kingmaker.Paper II · 2024 · 10M
- The Carnatic Wars, the Anglo-Mysore Wars and the Anglo-Maratha Wars had virtually eliminated the French from the contest of supremacy in South India. Discuss.Paper II · 2023 · 20M