UPSC Prelims · 2001 · GS Paper I · Q26
Assertion (A): The Battle of Khanua was certainly more decisive and significant than the First Battle of Panipat. Reason (R): Rana Sanga, the Rajput hero, was certainly a more formidable adversary than Ibrahim Lodi.
- (A)Both A and R are individually true, and R is the correct explanation of A
- (B)Both A and R are individually true, but R is NOT a correct explanation of A
- (C)A is true, but R is false
- (D)A is fasle, but R is true
Show answer
Answer: (D) A is fasle, but R is true
- Subject
- History
- Chapter
- Mughal Empire
Similar questions from other years
- What was the immediate reason for Ahmad Shah Abdali to invade India and fight the Third Battle of Panipat ?2010 · GS Paper I · Q139
- Consider the following statements: 1. In the Third Battle of Panipat, Ahmed Shah Abdali defeated Ibrahim Lodi. 2. Tipu Sultan was killed in the Third Anglo-Mysore War. 3. Mir…2004 · GS Paper I · Q134
- Consider the following statements: 1. The Cholas defeated Pandya and Chera rulers and established their domination over peninsular India in early medieval times. 2. The Cholas…2003 · GS Paper I · Q30
- Ibadat Khana at Fatehpur Sikri was2014 · GS Paper I · Q13
- With reference to Indian history, consider the following statements: 1. The first Mongol invasion of India happened during the reign of Jalal-ud-din Khalji. 2. During the reign of…2022 · GS Paper I · Q57
- Which one of the following is the most significant contribution of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel to modern India ?1991 · GS Paper I · Q25