UPSC History Optional · Paper II · 1987 · Q1(a) · 20 marks
‘The revolution of 1760 (Bengal) was really no revolution.’
- Chapter
- British Expansion in India
- Topic
- Bengal: Plassey, Buxar and After
Model answer
No model answer for this question yet. Search the bank for related questions and their answers.
Search all Optional PYQs →Similar questions from other years
- Why is the Quit India Movement characterized as a 'Spontaneous Revolution’? Did it accelerate the process of Indian independence?Paper II · 2019 · Q4(a) · 20 marks · Model answer
- Do you think that Quit India movement was a Spontaneous Revolution?30Paper II · 2009 · Q4(b) · 30 marks
- The course of the English industrialization was too long drawn to be considered a revolution. Comment 20 MarksPaper II · 2024 · Q6(a) · 20 marks · Model answer
- The Quit India Movement was a spontaneous revolt of the people against British rule.Paper II · 2001 · Q1(d) · 20 marks
- To characterize the quit India Movement as ‘Spontaneous revolution’ would be partial interpretation, so also would be to look up at it as the culmination of Gandhian Satyagraha movements” Elucidate.Paper II · 2015 · Q2(b) · 20 marks
- Trace the course and explain the consequences of the drain of wealth from Bengal in the eighteenth century.Paper II · 1982 · Q2 · 60 marks