UPSC History Optional · Paper II · 1983 · Q1(c) · 20 marks
‘The Mutiny was not inevitable in 1857, but it was inherent in the constitution of the Empire.'
- Chapter
- Indian Response to British Rule
- Topic
- Revolt of 1857: Causes and Course
Model answer
No model answer for this question yet. Search the bank for related questions and their answers.
Search all Optional PYQs →Similar questions from other years
- “The Mutiny of 1857 was much more than a Mutiny of Sepoys and much less than a National Rebellion.” Comment.Paper II · 2016 · Q1(d) · 10 marks · Model answer
- Examine the nature of the Revolt of 1857 and indicate the manifold changes in British civil and military administration of India after 1857.Paper II · 1998 · Q3 · 60 marks
- Critically examine the nature of the Revolt of 1857. How did it affect the British policy in India after 1858?Paper II · 1980 · Q2 · 60 marks
- ‘The tribal and peasant rebellion laid the foundation of the revolt of 1857’.Paper II · 2001 · Q1(b) · 20 marks
- For long, the Revolt of 1857, has been mistaken to be a mere mutiny of the Indian sepoys in the Bengal army. However, its causes need to be searched for not only in the dissatisfaction of the army but in a long drawn process of fundamental Social and economic change that upset the peasant communities. Discuss.Paper II · 2020 · Q2(b) · 20 marks
- “The military, feudal and traditional overtones of the Revolt of 1857 were overshadowed by its nationalist or proto-nationalist character.” Critically examinePaper II · 2014 · Q1(c) · 10 marks