UPSC History Optional · Paper I · 2019 · Q2(a) · 15 marks
Do you agree that archaeological evidence often helps in the better understanding of literary sources? Comment.
- Chapter
- Sources
- Topic
- Archaeology, Inscriptions, Coins and Seals
Model answer
A full model answer to this question is available.
Read the model answer →Similar questions from other years
- “While using the accounts of foreign writers, historians must distinguish between statements based on hearsay and those grounded in perceptive observations.” Elaborate with examples.Paper I · 2014 · Q2(a) · 15 marks
- Discuss different types of Megalithic burial practices in India. How far does the archaeological evidence from it help us to know the religious beliefs and cultural practices? 15 MarksPaper I · 2024 · Q2(b) · 15 marks · Model answer
- To what extent archaeological materials are useful in understanding the progress of Neolithic man in India?Paper I · 2010 · Q2(a) · 30 marks
- Discuss critically the relative importance of the different source for the history of the Mauryan period.Paper I · 1986 · Q3 · 60 marks
- What is meant by the ‘rediscovery of ancient civilization’? Show how the ‘New Learning’ was a major element in the beginning of Modern Europe.Paper II · 1986 · Q6 · 60 marks
- Foreign accounts as a source of ancient Indian history may have some advantages but also have a few shortcomings. Citing appropriate examples, examine the statement.Paper I · 2022 · Q2(b) · 15 marks · Model answer