UPSC History Optional · Paper II · 2018 · Q1(e) · 10 marks
“States’ reorganization did not, of course, resolve all the problems relating to linguistic conflicts.” Critically examine
- Chapter
- Consolidation as a Nation
- Topic
- Linguistic Reorganisation, Federalism and Regionalism
Model answer
A full model answer to this question is available.
Read the model answer →Similar questions from other years
- “The Reorganisation of the States on the basis of language was a major aspect of national consolidation and integration.” Comment.Paper II · 2020 · Q4(c) · 10 marks · Model answer
- “The movement for linguistic States generated deep apprehensions among the nationalist elite. They feared it would lead to the Balkanization of India.” Examine. 10 MarksPaper II · 2025 · Q2(c) · 10 marks · Model answer
- Regionalism in India after 1947 was occasioned by developmental imperatives as much as linguistic particularism. – Elucidate. 20 MarksPaper II · 2024 · Q3(b) · 20 marks · Model answer
- “The reorganization resulted in rationalizing the political map of India without seriously weakening its-unity. If anything, its result has been functional, in as much as it removed what had been a major source of discord, and created homogeneous political units which could be administered through a medium that the vast majority of the population understood. Indeed, it can be said with the benefit of hindsight that language, rather than being a force for division, has proved a cementing and integrating influence.” Examine.Paper II · 2013 · Q4(b) · 25 marks
- ‘The relations of the Native States, however conducted are essentially relations with the British Crown and not with the Indian Government.’Paper II · 1991 · Q1(d) · 20 marks
- Examine the issues involved in the American Civil War. Was it a contest between two separate nations?Paper II · 1991 · Q7 · 60 marks