← Model Answers

Paper I · 2016 · Q 5(b) · 10 Marks

Analyze the significance of the Uttaramerur inscriptions of the Chola King Parantaka I.

12. The Cholas › Local Self-Government

Answer:

The Uttaramerur inscriptions of Parantaka I, dated to the early tenth century, describe in remarkable detail the constitution of a Chola village assembly. They are the single most important document of local self-government in early Indian history.

What the inscriptions record

  • They set out the constitution of the sabha of the brahmadeya village of Uttaramerur.
  • Members were chosen by lot, the kudavolai system, from names placed in a pot.
  • The village was divided into thirty wards, each nominating eligible candidates.
  • Work was carried on through committees (variyams) for tanks, gardens, gold and justice.

Qualifications and disqualifications

  • Candidates required a stated extent of taxpaying land and a house on their own site.
  • They had to be between thirty-five and seventy years of age and versed in the Vedas.
  • Those who had not rendered accounts, or their relatives, were debarred.
  • Persons guilty of specified offences were permanently disqualified.
  • Members serving on one committee could not immediately serve on another.

Their significance

  • They prove the existence of an organised, rule-bound system of village administration.
  • They show accountability through audit and disqualification for default.
  • They reveal an oligarchy of landholding and learned men rather than a democracy.
  • Nilakanta Sastri used them as evidence of a highly developed Chola polity.

Their limitations

  • They describe a brahmadeya village, not the ordinary ur of cultivators.
  • Royal intervention in framing the constitution shows the limits of autonomy.
  • Burton Stein questioned how far such assemblies indicate a centralised state.
  • They nonetheless remain unmatched as evidence of institutionalised local government.

The Uttaramerur inscriptions are therefore of outstanding significance as evidence for institutionalised local government under the Cholas. As Nilakanta Sastri emphasised, they reveal genuine autonomy conducted with written rules and audited accounts, though membership was confined to men of property and learning within a Brahmana settlement.