Paper II · 2019 · Q 5(c) · 10 Marks
"The ineffectiveness of the League of Nations to prevent or to check Japanese aggression against China was the first serious blow to its prestige as an agency for providing security." Critically examine.
The Inter-War Years › League of Nations
Answer:
The Manchurian crisis of 1931-33 was indeed the League of Nations' first great test in a major-power aggression, and its manifest failure to check Japan dealt the first serious blow to its authority as a guarantor of collective security.
The Manchurian crisis
- Japan seized Manchuria after the Mukden incident of September 1931, staged by its own army.
- China appealed to the League under the Covenant.
- The Lytton Commission reported only in 1932, condemning Japan but recommending autonomy under Chinese sovereignty.
- Japan simply withdrew from the League in 1933 and retained Manchuria as Manchukuo.
Why the League failed
- No economic sanctions were imposed and no force was contemplated.
- Britain and France, preoccupied with the Depression, would not act far from Europe.
- The absence of the United States and the USSR deprived the League of decisive power.
- The requirement of unanimity and the lack of any army made enforcement impossible.
The consequences
- It demonstrated that a determined great power could defy the League with impunity.
- Mussolini and Hitler drew the obvious lesson, seen in Abyssinia and the Rhineland.
- Collective security was fatally discredited, opening the road to 1939.
The statement is therefore justified. Manchuria was the first occasion on which the League's central promise was tested against a great power and found empty, and as historians agree, the impunity Japan enjoyed set the precedent of aggression unpunished that led directly to the Second World War.