Paper II · 2020 · Q 6(c) · 10 Marks
"The 1848 revolutions frightened the crowned heads of Europe and caused several to abdicate. Those who remained were cognizant of the threats posed by liberalism, nationalism and socialism." Comment.
Nationalism and the Revolutions of 1848 › 1848 Revolutions
Answer:
The revolutions of 1848, which swept across much of Europe in a single dramatic year, gravely alarmed the continent's ruling monarchs, toppling some and forcing those who remained to reckon henceforth with the powerful new forces of liberalism, nationalism and socialism that the upheaval had unleashed.
The shock to the monarchies
- Revolutions erupted almost simultaneously in France, the German and Italian states, and the Habsburg Empire.
- In France the monarchy of Louis Philippe fell and the Second Republic was proclaimed.
- Metternich, the very symbol of conservative reaction, was forced to flee Vienna.
The lasting awareness
- Although most of the revolutions were ultimately suppressed, the rulers could no longer ignore the new forces.
- Liberalism, nationalism and socialism had shown their power to mobilise the masses.
- Later statecraft, as of Bismarck and Cavour, sought to harness nationalism from above rather than resist it.
Why they failed
- The revolutionaries were divided between liberals, nationalists and socialists.
- The middle classes drew back once radical social demands emerged, fearing property loss.
- Peasant support fell away once feudal dues were abolished in central Europe.
- The armies remained loyal to the crowns, and Russia aided the Habsburgs in Hungary.
- Trevelyan called 1848 the turning point at which modern history failed to turn.
The statement is thus valid: 1848 frightened Europe's monarchs and left them permanently aware of the threats of liberalism, nationalism and socialism. Even though the revolutions largely failed, as historians note, they marked a turning point after which no ruler could safely disregard these emerging political forces.